>
> Perhaps it would be possible to run MK armhf style compiled on the 
>> Ultra96, how to go about testing that and is this a viable solution ?
>
> I meant run the armhf .debs on the Ultra96 board.  

On Sunday, 25 August 2019 14:05:53 UTC+2, Michael Brown wrote:
>
> BTW:
>
> Beagleboard x15 is armv7-a --> armhf ?
> It seems like the rpi3's can run armhf compiled software, I do not know if 
> this requires the whole os to be armhf compiled also ?
>
> Perhaps it would be possible to run MK armhf style compiled on the 
> Ultra96, how to go about testing that and is this a viable solution ?
>
> On Sunday, 25 August 2019 13:59:58 UTC+2, Michael Brown wrote:
>>
>> Well I found my notes building debs for the armhf is a peice of cake (and 
>> takes around 2 min)
>>
>> ## ------------ newest -------------------#
>> cd machinekit-hal
>> time scripts/build_docker -t armhf_9 -c deb
>>
>> cd machinekit-cnc
>> time scripts/build_docker -t armhf_9 -c deb
>>
>> ## ---------------------------------------#
>>
>> However build scripts / instructions have no arm64 support and I can only 
>> find scattered attempts of building for arm64 soc's,
>> and most importantly no real sucessfull arm64 machinekit run reports.
>>
>> Since I have no idea how armhf support was added (before mksocfpga), I 
>> have no clue as to what is needed to be added to gain arm64
>> (deb) compilation support, which I see as a requirement for adding the 
>> xilinx (arm64) mpsoc based Ultra96 board port to mksocfpga....?
>>
>> I'd rather Not have to start by messing around with (uninstructed) arm64 
>> rip builds, and then have to do the Vivado 2018.x fpga work on top of that
>> following a (possible) arm64 package build... ?
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, 24 August 2019 14:20:49 UTC+2, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/24/2019 5:19 AM, Michael Brown wrote: 
>>> > Now having some experience with Vivado and the Ultra96 I'm thinking of 
>>> > following up on this.. 
>>> > Xilinx has a Ultra96 Debian buster image online here as a starting 
>>> point: 
>>> > 
>>> https://www.xilinx.com/products/design-tools/ai-inference/ai-developer-hub.html#edge
>>>  
>>>
>>> Looks like an interesting board.  The Ultrascale+ parts are really 
>>> nice to work with.  I support a ZCU104 design for my Day Job that runs 
>>> video compression/streaming between the HDMI ports and Ethernet. 
>>>
>>> NOTE: I have a uSD image that's "Plain ole Debian" if you want 
>>> something more generic to work with than the Xilinx AI SDK.  It's for 
>>> the ZCU104 but you should be able to use it as-is with the Ultra96 if 
>>> you swap out the boot files (kernel, device-tree, & U-Boot).  Let me 
>>> know if you're interested. 
>>>
>>> > Next to find out how to install (aarch64) ARM64 Machinekit. 
>>> > Are there yet arm64 Machinekit packages online ? 
>>> > Or 
>>> > What are the commands for building mk-hal/cnc from source (been a 
>>> while 
>>> > since I last built debs...) 
>>>
>>> It's been ages since I've compiled from source.  I always just look at 
>>> the CI files and do it manually: 
>>>
>>> https://github.com/machinekit/machinekit/blob/master/.travis.yml#L92 
>>>
>>> https://github.com/machinekit/machinekit/blob/master/scripts/build_docker 
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Charles Steinkuehler 
>>> [email protected] 
>>>
>>

-- 
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: 
https://github.com/machinekit
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Machinekit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/2fd46088-d63c-42dc-931c-2c61663742da%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to