Hi,
I was somewhat successful in solving this issue. Description on Github: 
https://github.com/machinekit/machinekit-hal/issues/271

Cern.


Apr 11, 2020, 01:38 by [email protected]:

> Hmmm,
> it looks like package installation should be included in CI test run.
>
> I am no expert at packaging, either. Debian or otherwise. (This is Zultron's 
> area and I hope he will pop in.) What I discovered so far is that there was 
> some discussion about functionality which would allow excluding files 
> previously included by wildcard resolution in .install files: 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=436240 , but I don't think 
> it is currently available. (Debian developers are probably not big on set 
> operations.)
>
> The only thing I can come with up now, is to create script which would cure 
> the .install files at runtime and be placed here: 
> https://github.com/machinekit/machinekit-hal/blob/98a93c227ac2fa4e81aca40887d08b717eb926ad/debian/rules#L149
>  . Trying to just list all files manually fails because not all platforms 
> create all files. (On the same note: usr/share/linuxcnc/Makefile.*) (First 
> thing I tried: https://github.com/cerna/machinekit-hal/actions/runs/75572559 )
>
> I think this is serious bug and should be solved (somewhat) properly. 
> Zultron, what so you think?
>
> BTW, didn't you want to create the build pipeline on Travis? Maybe I gave the 
> wrong impression: The reason why I chose the Github Actions is that it can 
> (at least I think it can) provide turn-key solution for everybody with just 
> forking the repo on Github without the need for setting up tokens and 
> whatnots. However, by the motto of "more stripes, more adidas" I fully 
> support and plan to multiple CD/CI services - so when one goes under or stops 
> the free plan, nothing really happens.
>
> BTW, building Docker images with this logic: 
> https://github.com/cmcquinn/machinekit-hal/blob/master/.github/workflows/docker-containers.yaml
>  won't work because in Github Actions workflows cannot wait on each other. So 
> the one building Docker images will run on the same time as the one building 
> the Machinekit application. So the one building the Machinekit application 
> will pull the older images and very probably fail. It all has to be 
> integrated into one workflow.
>
> Cern.
>
>
> Apr 10, 2020, 03:18 by [email protected]:
>
>> Alright so I've been working on getting automated Docker container builds 
>> going, and I've run into a hiccup. As you mentioned, machinekit-cnc needs 
>> files from machinekit-hal to build, and the approach that I am taking to 
>> solve the problem is to build Docker containers for machinekit-cnc using the 
>> ones for machinekit-hal as a base, and installing the Debian packages 
>> generated from the mk-hal build into the mk-cnc containers. Here is where I 
>> run into a problem. The build needs header files that are provided by the 
>> machinekit-hal-dev package, which depends on machinekit-hal, but both 
>> packages provide /usr/bin/comp. When installing via apt-get install, apt 
>> detects that machinekit-hal-dev tries to overwrite /usr/bin/comp from 
>> machinekit-hal and aborts the install. This behavior can be mitigated for 
>> non sys_root environments by passing -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-overwrite" 
>> to apt. However, when those two packages are specified in a multistrap 
>> config, multistrap fails silently and does not install any of the machinekit 
>> packages.
>>
>> I am not very familiar with Debian packaging, but noticed that the file 
>> debian/machinekit-hal.install in the mk-hal repo contains the line usr/bin/* 
>> which I assume sweeps up everything produced by the build under /usr/bin and 
>> puts it into the Debian package. Is there a way to exclude /usr/bin/comp 
>> from the machinekit-hal package so that we can install the 
>> machinekit-hal-dev package in multistrap systems?
>>
>> You can follow along with what I have been doing at > 
>> cmcquinn/machinekit-hal <https://github.com/cmcquinn/machinekit-hal>>  and > 
>> cmcquinn/machinekit-cnc <https://github.com/cmcquinn/machinekit-cnc>> .
>>
>> Regards,
>> Cameron McQuinn
>>
>> On Sunday, March 22, 2020 at 8:00:20 AM UTC-6, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, 
>>> Mar 22, 2020, 03:09 by >> [email protected] <>>> : 
>>>  
>>> > What is the status of Travis CI builds for machinekit-cnc? I would love 
>>> > to help get this going if needed. Let me know how I can help :) 
>>> > 
>>> The current status is that it is not working. And frankly have no idea if 
>>> it ever worked or was just left as a something from the original split into 
>>> separate repositories. I am currently trying to implement the CI/CD flow 
>>> based on Github Actions. (You can read about it here: >> 
>>> https://github.com/machinekit/>> machinekit-hal/issues/268>>  .) Main 
>>> reason for this is the higher limits for Open-Source project, it is simply 
>>> in the Github repository, so every fork will have it by default and Github 
>>> will store the artifacts for later download. 
>>>  
>>> Of course, if somebody will implement Travis CI jobs, then that's good for 
>>> redundancy. 
>>>  
>>> How I imagine it to work is following: The mk-cross-builder code was 
>>> integrated into Machinekit-HAL repository, so in given time some job will 
>>> build from it Debian images and store them in some repository (I am 
>>> thinking about Github Packages as it is directly connected to Github Git 
>>> repository and it is on one network with Github Actions workers). On this 
>>> will be constructed the Machinekit-HAL building and packaging. 
>>>  
>>> Given that Machinekit-CNC needs for its build the Machinekit-HAL (some info 
>>> can be glanced from >> https://github.com/machinekit/>> 
>>> machinekit-cnc/pull/93>>  ), I was thinking that Machinekit-CNC will add 
>>> another onion layer to the Machinekit-HAL created builder images with its 
>>> own build dependencies and from this get its own builder (or builder which 
>>> will be capable of building both Machinekit-HAL and Machinekit-CNC). 
>>>  
>>> So what needs to be done is to rework the Debian packaging in 
>>> Machinekit-CNC ("debian" folder in root of the repository), build of the 
>>> specific Machinekit-CNC builder (so far it can just take the Machinekit-HAL 
>>> builder images from DockerHub) and the CI job. 
>>>  
>>> If you have specific question, just ask. Here or on the Matrix chat. 
>>> Cern. 
>>>  
>>> > 
>>> > Thanks, 
>>> > Cameron McQuinn 
>>> > 
>>> > -- 
>>> > website: >> http://www.machinekit.io>>  blog: >> 
>>> > http://blog.machinekit.io>>  github: >> https://github.com/machinekit>> 
>>> > --- 
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> > "Machinekit" group. 
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> > email to >> machi...@>> googlegroups.com <>>> . 
>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit >> 
>>> > https://groups.google.com/d/>> msgid/machinekit/0bca17f7->> 
>>> > 2840-483a-9fc1-63b5a3e642fb%>> 40googlegroups.com>> . 
>>> > 
>>>  
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>  website: > http://www.machinekit.io>  blog: > http://blog.machinekit.io>  
>> github: > https://github.com/machinekit
>>  --- 
>>  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Machinekit" group.
>>  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to > [email protected]> .
>>  To view this discussion on the web visit > 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/d4a6d775-cb1c-4556-9cd2-807cbde080c7%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/d4a6d775-cb1c-4556-9cd2-807cbde080c7%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>>
>>  .
>>
>
> -- 
> website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: 
> https://github.com/machinekit
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Machinekit" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/M4aSH6m--3-2%40tuta.io.
>

-- 
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: 
https://github.com/machinekit
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Machinekit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/M4f2HH---7-2%40tuta.io.

Reply via email to