What's the easiest way to connect directly to the msgd socket?

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 6:54 PM <[email protected]> wrote:

> What about the ZMQ socket on the msgd process, can you see the messages
> there? Given that I cannot find the error_channel() definition in
> Machinekit-HAL, I am not sure if the support for it is done in rtapi
> logging. I have a mounting anxiety that it is one of the things which were
> in LinuxCNC but were superseded in Machinekit and now it is a bloody stump.
> (In other words, something which on some nice day somebody will have to
> solve/repair).
>
> However, still it is odd that C call to rtapi_print_msg you can see and
> python call to RTAPILogger you cannot - when it uses the exact same
> function - or at least it looks like it. As I said, I don't know Python
> well, but can you stop/step into (debug) when the python calls
> the rtapi_print_msg?
>
> BTW, are you watching with right logging level?
>
> Cern.
>
>
> Jul 25, 2020, 02:27 by [email protected]:
>
> > I’ll have to dig a little deeper. I’m monitoring the error channel in
> Python using something like this (this is the only process calling poll on
> the error_channel):
> >
> > import linuxcnc
> > e = linuxcnc.error_channel()
> >
> > while True:
> >  error = e.poll()
> >  if error:
> >  print error
> >  sleep(.1)
> >
> > I don’t see error messages come through when I use a separate Python
> process to log messages using RTAPILogger, but I do when using
> rtapi_print_msg in a real time component. I wasn’t aware of the debugging
> issues, so I’ll take a closer look. Thanks for the info!
> >
> >
> >> On Jul 24, 2020, at 5:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Jul 24, 2020, 23:14 by [email protected]:
> >>
> >>> Unlike rtapi_print_msg, this doesn't seem to append messages to the
> linuxcnc.error_channel. Is there anyway to do so in python?
> >>>
> >> maybe I don't understand the question (and this python stuff is a
> little bit outside my comfort zone), however isn't the RTAPILogger
> implemented as a Cython wrapper of rtapi_print_msg? (In
> src/hal/cython/machinekit/rtapi.pyx.) And as such it should have the same
> output.
> >>
> >> Of course like many things in Machinekit, the logging project was
> started, implemented to a functioning state but then unfortunately left
> without much support and bugfixing, so there are problems. For example
> https://github.com/machinekit/machinekit-hal/issues/199
> >>
> >> Cern.
> >>
> >>>> On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 12:19:57 AM UTC-6
> [email protected] wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yishin Li writes:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Michael,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 12:17:06 AM UTC+8, Michael Haberler
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> HOWEVER it does not log in sequence with the other events in
> HAL/RTAPI and
> >>>>>> that can be key for determining causality
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> that is the primary reason for the unified logging architecture
> which
> >>>>>> funnels every log message through a message queue regardless of
> origin so
> >>>>>> sequencing is retained - RT, user (remember logging being a mess
> :-? like a
> >>>>>> bit here, a bit there, and a bit in dmesg and _no_ sequencing? )
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> if you dont care about sequencing for one reason or the other, then
> the
> >>>>>> Python syslog package is fine
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> RTAPILogger works!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here's the RTAPILogger example:
> >>>>> from machinekit import rtapi
> >>>>> rtapi.init_RTAPI()
> >>>>>
> >>>> No need to call init_RTAPI for logging -> it does only initialize
> RTAPICommand so it
> >>>> can be used from the module e.g. rtapi.loadrt('blbla')
> >>>>
> >>>>> log = rtapi.RTAPILogger(level=rtapi.MSG_ERR,tag="marker")
> >>>>> print >> log, "some message"
> >>>>> Here's the /var/log/linuxcnc.log:
> >>>>> Jul 16 10:34:17 interlaken msgd:0: marker:10350:user some message
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Awesome!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you very much,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Yishin
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Alexander
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> website: > http://www.machinekit.io>  blog: >
> http://blog.machinekit.io>  github: > https://github.com/machinekit
> >>> ---
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Machinekit" group.
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to > [email protected]> .
> >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/d3244a63-a003-4fa3-9ec0-2c44f1a0543an%40googlegroups.com
> <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/d3244a63-a003-4fa3-9ec0-2c44f1a0543an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>>
> .
> >>>
> >
> > --
> > website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io
> github: https://github.com/machinekit
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Machinekit" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected].
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/EC8705B1-4EE5-4F9E-896A-48C4446AB8A5%40pocketnc.com
> .
> >
>
>

-- 
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: 
https://github.com/machinekit
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Machinekit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/CAPEK9qZ4%3DP9QOWLLsqJVg%3DdQx2gBg6MaSG%3DwgOE2-H0b1Zu0cA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to