I recently ran into the same issue and found a great option at epitum3d.com <https://epitum3d.com/printers/>. They offer a model that is ideal for working with engineering and composite plastics. The printer has a heated chamber up to 90 degrees, which significantly improves the quality of the final models. I was surprised that for such a price, the printer does not require much post-processing, and the surface quality is just great.
On Friday, January 31, 2025 at 4:14:48 PM UTC+2 marry...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi! I recently encountered a similar problem and found a great option. 3D > Printers from epitum3d.com are ideal for working with engineering > plastics. They have high-quality assembly, and the models provide accurate > printing of even complex parts. The peculiarity is that the finished > products are obtained with a very smooth surface, so there is practically > no need for finishing. Plus, the price is quite adequate for this level of > capabilities. > > понедельник, 16 февраля 2015 г. в 15:59:03 UTC+2, viestur...@gmail.com: > >> >> >> On Monday, February 16, 2015 at 7:27:10 AM UTC+2, Ryan Press wrote: >>> >>> >>> It's kinda disappointing that nobody could take a couple minutes to >>> reply, but I know you guys are busy. I could post to the LinuxCNC list but >>> I imagine they're not too excited about supporting this fork. >>> >> >> It is kinda disappointing that there are so few corexy style machines, >> driven by Machinekit/LinuxCNC and so the number of users actually having >> any experience with that is not bigger :) >> For example, my corexy build 2 ago finally reached "linear guides, belts >> and motors are assembled" stage, I have no idea about further progress with >> electronics as there are more urgent projects, so regarding your questions, >> I have not yet tried anything to drive corexy with Machinekits, so I have >> no suggestions yet, how to solve these things. >> What I am trying to say is that lack of answers should not be taken >> personally. it might be that you are one of first users that encounter such >> things _and_ wants to correct them instead of just ignoring due to lack of >> ability to solve (speaking for myself here with regards to ignoring >> inadequate soft limits due to strange kinematics of machine). >> >> >>> Anyway I have solved my problems in a different way. Rather than do the >>> CoreXY calculation in the kinematics, I have done it in the HAL chain. In >>> this way everything works as a normal XY stage and there is nothing funny >>> with the jogging or the limits. This also has the advantage of not needing >>> anything outside of trunk. >>> >> >> Thank you for sharing! >> >> Viesturs >> > -- website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: https://github.com/machinekit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Machinekit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to machinekit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/fbbdecc0-830d-4ea4-b7a5-0ebbf4395321n%40googlegroups.com.
