We also use ColorSync all the way through the imaging pipe for web content, so I'm not sure to what, specifically, they're referring. Apple had no problem standing up in front of an auditorium to show how well IE's ColorSync worked, and even agreed a test was flawed on one occasion when there was a question. It's obviously possible there's a bug in IE, but nobody has pointed out the problem to us, as far as I know. We even worked on the standardization of referencing ICCP profiles from HTML with Apple, which is more than I could say for Omni group. However, I'm glad Omni can leverage our work. If you can't be first, you should at least be better. --Brad -----Original Message----- From: Harry Zink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:52 AM To: Mac Internet Explorer Talk Subject: Colorsync in IE? A statement from the OMNI folks regarding enhancemnets in their latest version of OMNIWEB got my attention: --- OmniWeb 4.0rc1 has improved Flash support and JavaScript compatibility, better stability and performance, simplified bookmark import/editing, and new ColorSync support: "we worked with Apple to ensure that we use ColorSync correctly all the way through the imaging pipe, so (**unlike every other browser, according to Apple**) we actually display final images completely accurately." --- (emphasis, mine) So, why would Apple claim this from 'every other browser', which I assume includes IE, when you guys are working pretty hard on making IE work with OS X - and when Apple keeps changing the rug from underneath you? Don't get me wrong, I think OmniWeb has some nice features, and the full cocoa app *should* perform nicely on an OS that were properly optimized and refined, but I still believe that IE offers more in terms of user features... (albeit the use of drawers is sweet, though not much different than IE's) Harry To unsubscribe send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
