Title: Iraq: Weapons of Mass Destruction
 
 

Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade
Skip all menus (access key: 2) Skip first menu (access key: 1)
Fran�ais Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
DFAIT Home Media Room Embassies and Consulates About Us
Photo illustration of people, Canadian flag, city and globe.

Foreign Policy

International Trade

Travel Assistance

Countries and Regions

Culture, Education and Youth

Ministers and Secretaries of State

Iraq: Weapons of Mass Destruction

Canada continues to have concerns about Iraq's intentions to reconstitute its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs.

Concerns persist regarding Iraq's probable stocks of chemical and biological weapons, and hard information on Iraqi WMD development programs remains unattainable. While there is no evidence we are aware of that Iraq has resumed production of chemical weapons (CW) agents since the departure of UN weapons inspectors in 1998, there is concern that it is rebuilding the infrastructure it would need to do so.

There is also a high probability that Iraq retains small quantities of biological weapons (BW) agents or weapons. While there is no evidence we are aware of that Iraq has resumed production of BW agents since 1998, it could have done so without being detected. As the Iraqi government has used chemical and possibly biological weapons in the past against its own citizens and Iran, continued possession of any CW or BW capability would be a matter of grave concern.

Iraq has retained at least a modest technical capability that could be a basis for the resumption of a nuclear weapons development program. It is believed, however, that Iraq neither possesses a nuclear weapon nor is close to having one, in large measure due to the difficulty of producing or otherwise acquiring the necessary weapons-grade fissile material. At present, Iraq cannot produce sufficient quantities of fissile material to produce a nuclear explosive device, and would find it difficult to obtain such material from external sources without detection.

UN Special Commission

The Government of Iraq formally accepted UN Security Council Resolution 687 (April 1991), establishing the terms and conditions of the cease-fire that ended military operations following Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Under these terms, Iraq accepted unconditionally and under international supervision the destruction, removal, or rendering harmless of all its weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles, and to allow UN inspections to verify Iraq's compliance. The UN Special Commission (UNSCOM) was established in 1991 to carry out immediate on-site inspections, and to verify Iraqi compliance with its obligations. Although UNSCOM inspections and other activity over the period 1991-1998 did uncover and result in the destruction of considerable elements of the Iraqi WMD and missile development programs, systematic Iraqi efforts to conceal such programs and to deceive UN inspectors resulted in significant uncertainty in some areas.

International Atomic Energy Agency Action Team

Between 1991 and December 1998, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) carried out inspections in Iraq in accordance with UN Security Council resolutions. It provided the nuclear-related technical expertise for UNSCOM and continues to maintain an Action Team that can be mobilized on short notice to support the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC).

The Agency also applies limited safeguards in Iraq under a comprehensive safeguards agreement concluded in conformity with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Safeguards inspections focus on Iraq's declared nuclear material and are not a substitute for the verification activities mandated by the relevant Security Council resolutions.

UNSCOM/IAEA Findings

The IAEA learned that in 1991, Iraq was within 6 to 24 months of building a nuclear explosive device. UN inspectors from the IAEA destroyed, removed or placed under monitoring all of Iraq's known nuclear-related facilities and materials.

By the time of UNSCOM's withdrawal in December 1998, the IAEA believed that it had obtained a "technically coherent picture" of Iraq's past undeclared nuclear activities. Despite recent media reports, the IAEA has not obtained any significant new information and its assessment of Iraqi nuclear activities remains unchanged. The Agency also emphasizes that, until inspections resume, it is unable to determine with any certainty whether, or to what extent, any new or resumed undeclared activities may have been undertaken by Iraq since UNSCOM's withdrawal in 1998.

According to UNSCOM, Iraq began its programs to develop biological and chemical weapons in the early 1970s. In 1995, following the defection of Saddam Hussein's son-in-law, inspectors gained greater knowledge about Iraq's biological weapons program, which was far more extensive than previously thought. Activities related to BW are the most difficult to detect because they require much more limited infrastructure. UNSCOM destroyed Iraq's declared BW facilities and set up monitoring of dual-use equipment at other facilities. However, UN inspectors were unable to determine the full extent of the Iraqi program prior to their departure in 1998.

UNSCOM also uncovered a vast Iraqi chemical weapons program. Between 1991 and 1998, it supervised the destruction of over 40,000 filled and unfilled chemical munitions and 411 tonnes of bulk CW agents. However, UNSCOM reported that the destruction of about 2,000 unfilled munitions was uncertain, that the destruction by melting of 15,000 rockets was not verifiable, and that 500 mustard-filled shells remained unaccounted for. In addition, the unilateral destruction in 1991 by Iraq of 242 tonnes of precursors for VX production was only partly accounted for. While Iraq claimed that it never turned VX into a weapon, in 1998 degradation products of VX were found by a U.S. laboratory on missile warhead remnants.

Before 1991, Iraq was also actively purchasing, developing and producing long-range missiles that could have been used to deliver its chemical and biological weapons, as well as future nuclear weapons. UNSCOM destroyed Iraq's declared stock of ballistic missiles, however discrepancies and the absence of inspectors for stocks declared destroyed by Iraq indicate that Iraq may have retained a small number of long-range missiles (up to 650 km), perhaps as many as a dozen.

For information on what questions remained unanswered by UNSCOM, refer to the final report by UNSCOM head, Richard Butler.

UNMOVIC

The UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission was established by Security Council Resolution 1284 on December 17, 1999, to replace UNSCOM. Its mandate is to disarm Iraq of its chemical and biological weapons and missiles and to operate a system of ongoing monitoring and verification to check Iraq's compliance with its obligations not to reacquire the same weapons prohibited by the Security Council. UNMOVIC reports solely to the UN. Iraq has so far prevented UNMOVIC from entering the country, but preparations, including training of inspectors, continue so that the organization can respond quickly when the time comes to begin operations in Iraq. In May-June 2001, Canada hosted a five-week training course for members of UNMOVIC.

Canada's Role

Canada participated in the work of UNSCOM from its inception. A number of UNSCOM weapons inspectors were Canadians. Canada is, therefore, aware from first-hand experience of the great lengths to which Iraq went to develop chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, as well as the extent of its efforts to hide them from inspectors. Canada has also supported UNMOVIC by offering training and other support. One former UNSCOM inspector--a Canadian with a long and distinguished career in the field--is also currently a member of the College of Commissioners, which provides advice and guidance to the UNMOVIC chairman. Two Canadians work at the UNMOVIC headquarters in New York and another three are members of the UNMOVIC inspection roster. Canadians also work for the IAEA, both as members of the Action Team and as safeguards inspectors.

There are a variety of credible international reports (linked below) that address the state of Iraqi weapons development.

Canada and Iraq


Last Updated:
2003-03-18

Top of Page
Important Notices

Reply via email to