Well, where are they?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 10:08 AM
Subject: Fw: SO, OUR PRESIDENT LIED ABOUT WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION?


 The news media knows this but has swept it under the rug.
Hypocrisy abounds.


  Re-evaluating Weapons of Mass Destruction
 
  "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
  develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
  That is our bottom line."     President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
 
  "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.
  We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
  destruction program."      President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
 
  "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal
  here.  For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear,
  chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest
  security threat we face."    Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
 
  "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times
  since 1983." Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb.18, 1998
 
  "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
  U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
  appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
  effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
  mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens.
  Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998
 
  "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
  destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and
  he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Rep. Nancy
  Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
 
  "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
  destruction and palaces for his cronies."  Madeline Albright, Clinton
  Secretary of State, Nov.10, 1999
 
  "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons
  programs.  Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
  continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status.  In  addition,
  Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the
  cover of an elicit missile program to develop longer-range  missiles that
  will threaten the United States and our allies."  Letter to President Bush,
  Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others,  Dec, 5, 2001
 
  "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
  threat to the peace and stability of the region.  He has ignored the
  mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction
  and the means of delivering them."  Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
 
  "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
  weapons throughout his country."         Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
 
  "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
  deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam
  is in power."  Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
 
  "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
  weapons of mass destruction."  Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
 
  "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998.  We are
  confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
  biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
  build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities.  Intelligence
  reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." Sen. Robert Byrd
  (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
 
  "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority
  to use force-if necessary-to disarm Saddam Hussein because I  believe
  that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real
  and grave threat to our security."  Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
 
  "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively
  to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the
  next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated
  the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
  Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct. 10, 2002
 
  "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
  every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy
  his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
  refused to do"  Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
 
  "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
  that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons
  stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also
  given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including  al Qaeda members
  .. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue
  to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will
  keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY),
  Oct 10, 2002
 
  "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam
  Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing  capacity for
  the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Bob Graham
  (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
 
 
  "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein.  He is a brutal,
  murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
  particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
  miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to
  his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass
  destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass
  destruction is real..."  Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23, 2003
 
 
  SO NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY
  WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS OIL BUDDIES???

Reply via email to