=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

           This E-mail is Sponsored by:   Small Dog Electronics
     --> Specializing in New & Factory Refurbished Apple computers <--
      Surf to <http://www.smalldog.com> Check out our daily specials!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

http://www.insanely-great.com/news.php?id=1212

OS X v. Linux: Just Not "Getting It"
By Remy Davison, Insanely Great Mac
November 4th 2002

Linux bigotry about OS X is not healthy - but fortunately, only a very small section 
of the Linux community is afflicted.

OS X is clearly causing some paranoia in certain sections of the Linux community - and 
it needn't be so, as both Linux and OS X have much in common - including a common foe.

IGM recently critiqued Timothy Butler's comments on  OS X v. Linux. Unfortunately, Mr. 
Butler is coming across as an anti-OS X Linux zealot, rather than an impartial 
advocate of the Linux platform, in his latest column.

To being with, Mr. Butler argues that rebuttals to his article [including mine] 
focused upon "specialty applications", such as Photoshop, Final Cut and Quark. This is 
selective at best, and misleading at worst. MS's Office was also considered a 
mission-critical app. Yes, there is OpenOffice and Crossover Office for Linux, but 
it's Mr. Butler here who's missing the point: AppleWorks opens Office files as well: 
but that doesn't mean everyone uses it [and yes, there's a Windows version of 
AppleWorks for education].

And Photoshop is not a 'specialty' application these days. And InDesign [and Pagemaker 
on OS 9] are standard fare for anyone who publishes a newsletter, a book or a 
magazine. If Mr. Butler thinks that all people do on their 'puters now is type, he's 
aso probably not aware that MS-DOS 5.0 has fancy new menus now.

A key point Mr. Butler misses, which IGM's OS X specialist, Derek Currie, mentioned in 
his comments, went directly to the crux of the matter:

"Plug and play."

If the "average user" is Mr. Butler's Linux target market (as he claims), then you can 
imagine how they'd react if drivers weren't available for their CDRW. Or scanner.

Take a trip down to, say, Yamaha, one of the best supporters of Mac firmware on their 
CDRWs. Will you find a Linux flash utility? No. And you might damage the EPROM on the 
burner if you try to do it under emulation.

Do a search for flashing CDRWs from Linux. One of the gems I got about burning via 
SCSI included this tale of woe:

"Irratic [sic] behavour followed by kernel-panic occured almost every attempt to burn 
CDs. Changing the BIOS-settings to 10 and disable wide negotiation proved successful 
on both adapters."

Run that past your "average user".

Or you could simply plug a SCSI burner into any Mac built since 1988. Or any Mac with 
a SCSI card that didn't ship with SCSI on the mobo.

Not content with an absence of firmware upgrades, Mr. Butler ploughs on regardless:

"In fact, if you are coming from a Windows background, Linux is arranged in a much 
more natural manor than the Mac interface is. Even though it looks a bit different 
than Windows, it works pretty much the same, thus providing a sizably lower learning 
curve than Mac OS."

The mind boggles at the monumental stupidity of such a statement. I can plunk 
virtually any 'Doze droid or OS 9 grandmother in front of OS X, and everything is 
pretty easy to figure out [although adding FruitMenu or ClassicMenu should be on your 
To Do list].

But for Mr. Butler to claim that "Linux is arranged in a much more natural manor than 
the Mac interface is" merely propagates his orrery of errors. [Memo to Mr. Butler: a 
manor is either a large country house, or a medieval manor-house surrounded by 
peasants who work for free most days of the year. We'll assume that definition wasn't 
his intention].

Back to OS X: One menu bar. One hard drive. Pop in an audio CD and iTunes opens. 
Insert a blank CD and DiskBurner gets going. Plug in your digicam and iPhoto launches. 
Double click on a PDF. Preview opens it. You didn't even need to install Acrobat 
Reader. Not hard.

[As an aside, I'd add that OS X has interface inconsistencies which make it inferior 
to OS 9 at this point; Apple would do well to push for a forceful rearticulation of 
its interface guidelines, but at least Quit is still Cmd-Q and close window is Cmd-W]

I have nothing against Linux. It is undeniable that it runs on very cheap hardware and 
the OS itself is free or inexpensive. However, we don't happen to feel it's ready for 
prime time as desktop system for average users. Not in comparison to the alternative 
Unix anyway.

But if I'm not mistaken, "average users" do not want to comb the web hunting for 
drivers, adds on and all sorts of other paraphenalia. This is why Apple "gets it". 
That eMac, iBook  or iMac comes as a complete package. It's always been the case. You 
don't need specialized drivers for FireWire, USB add-on cards or Ethernet 100bT cards. 
You don't need to upgrade the BIOS to get a piece of hardware to work. 

We'll leave Mr. Butler hoist by his own petard:

"Why switch to Mac OS X to use an unstable office suite  [He's referring to OpenOffice 
for OS X - ed.] that doesn't work like the rest of the environment, when you can get a 
stable version for Linux that works just like other Linux applications."

Methinks Mr. Butler protesteth too much. What do you think?

=-=-=
Web links for articles available on Web site version. Please refer to Web site version 
for all revisions, corrections and updates.

Post comments to this article and view reader comments at the Web site. Web site 
version of this article can be viewed at: 
http://www.insanely-great.com/news.php?id=1212 




=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Copyright (c) 2002 Insanely Great Mac. All rights reserved. This article 
may not be republished in part or whole without explicit written 
permission from Insanely Great Mac.

Brought to you by Insanely Great Mac <http://www.insanely-great.com/>

To SUBSCRIBE - send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject 
subscribe macnews

To UNSUBSCRIBE - send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject 
unsubscribe macnews

Subscription problems/questions please email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to