According to google the expression can be said either way. It's always
funny when people get angry because of something on the Internet. This
isn't real life afterall.

On 2/4/10, Hamster <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 05/02/2010, at 12:39 , John Musbach wrote:
>
>> There's no "u" in color, for peet sakes!
>
> Never before have I seen someone demonstrate in one, simple sentence how
> much of a complete idiot they are.
>
> Congratulations on being one of the dumbest people from whom I have ever had
> the misfortune of receiving an email.
>
> I'm sure you'll receive a plethora of emails explaining just how wrong you
> are, so I won't bother.
>
> I will however point out that the correct way of writing the expression you
> so valiantly (but failed) to attempt to write is "for Pete's sake".
>
> So please, in future, keep the evidence of your ignorance to yourself. May I
> suggest you read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spelling_differences and then
> apologise to the list for your complete lack of awareness.
>
> Helen._______________________________________________
> MacOSX-admin mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-admin
>


-- 
Best Regards,

John Musbach
_______________________________________________
MacOSX-admin mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-admin

Reply via email to