On Mar 9, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Tim Roberts wrote: > > On Mar 9, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Dan Shoop <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> In the case of CCC this is incorrect. If you're not seeing this behavior you >> are either using it impropperly or have an older version. >> >> Dik Utility can copy files or block copy. In each case it preserves properly >> but asr should be used instead. Note that in some case it may uncompress >> compressed files depending on the target and operation type, but this is not >> an issue. If it is, use asr. > > The underlying process that Disk Utility and CCC use is 'asr'. You can get > finer control from the command line version though and it appears to run a > bit faster.
Because, they Disk Utility really isn't asr and CCC can use either a patched rysnc or asr. You can tell Dik Utility and asr aren't the same with sc_usage or dtrace and watching they're completely different behavior. -d ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dan Shoop [email protected] GoogleVoice: 1-646-402-5293 aim: iWiring twitter: @colonelmode _______________________________________________ MacOSX-admin mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-admin
