On 10-Mar-2011, at 09:02, Neil Laubenthal wrote: > > So what's the real deal with atime vs noatime? Having the file modified date > changed just because you modified the file has always seemed kinda hokey to > me . . .in my view I've always thought that a modification date should > reflect the date a file was changed and I've never really considered an > access a change . . .although I can also see the argument that one might want > to track accesses as well.
Er… I have access to atime, ctime, mtime in find <http://www.unix.com/tips-tutorials/20526-mtime-ctime-atime.html> -- Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes _______________________________________________ MacOSX-admin mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-admin
