On Dec 26, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Neil Laubenthal wrote:
> 
> It isn't a perfect world . . .but then at least it isn't Windows. One of the 
> reasons for Apple's traditional stability (at least since Mac OS X shipped, 9 
> was a different story) and security advantages is the limited set of hardware 
> their OS needs to work with . . .this makes things like drivers a whole lot 
> easier to maintain. Are their bugs in Lion and drivers? Sure . . .there are 
> almost always bugs in software.

I don't see greater stability or security advantages with Mac OS X compared to 
linux. Quite frankly the converse. It is much more esoteric tracking down 
drivers on linux, should they be needed. But I think this has far less to do 
with integration, but as you say - a limited set of hardware choices with which 
customers can become derailed.

And then the pre-Mac OS X era absolutely demonstrates how you can have 
integrated OS and hardware, and yet have abysmal stability.

And yes - Windows. It's like experiencing a dog vomitting on your shoes, once 
per minute, until logging out. The one exception there *might* be is Windows 
Phone 7 (despite it's 1% market share, I give Microsoft more credit for the 
long haul in this area than Symbian or RIM; other than the lack of apps, it's 
actually seemingly more refined than Android.)

Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
MacOSX-admin mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-admin

Reply via email to