On 2010-09-07 04:23 , John Stalberg wrote:
A per user solution together with more clear limitations on running the same files in parallell [...] might turn out to be a bit more doable than it perhaps seems to be at first glance. A concurent rate setting could be somehow stacked and executed first in first done. The major file changes could be made unavailable for the user when in parallell mode.
i don't think you realize how much an engineer would shudder at the fundamental changes that would require to the underlying model of an application that was first released over a decade ago;
_______________________________________________ MacOSX-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk
