> > yeah; just another data point -- AT&T has been good enough for us for 2+ > years in Denver (with iPhone 3g, which is supposed to have worse > reception than iPhone 4), except reception had been spotty right at/in > our house, but that changed for the better a few months ago; however > there are places we've gone where the service has been poor (e.g. > Telluride, CO: no data, even voicemail is greatly delayed; Olympic > peninsula: almost no service driving from Port Angeles to Seattle; > Georgetown, ME: no service)
FWIW I live in Seattle and haven't had an issue with AT&T service between here and Port Angeles, and even had service in areas far more remote (in the general vicinity of Kalaloch, for example). I think it depends on the day, the weather, the pattern of the stars, and how much mana you have remaining... :) > so check your area's reputation and also places you tend to visit Always good advice. I've used AT&T for so long I don't have anything to compare it to, but I can't really complain. Then again, I've had cell service since the late 80's/early 90's back when coverage was limited to major metro areas and heavily traveled expressways. Compared to those days, anything is great, and I don't expect coverage in far-remote places._______________________________________________ MacOSX-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk
