On Nov 28, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Michael <[email protected]> wrote: > There's no reason for a standard that says "Remote execution of arbitrary > code cannot be prevented by the end user without addons to modify the > browser".
Can we talk about those add-ons? Because these two ¶ below made me pump my fist! > And there's no reason for a web browser not to run that remote untrusted code > in a sandbox that can be dumped if it's a memory leak, or at least > identifiable as to which sandbox is the leak. > > Fifteen years ago, 1999, ... was that when FF 3 was new? … (We're going backwards, and I'm not going to take it any more)
_______________________________________________ MacOSX-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk
