I gave up on Soundflower a few years ago, similar reasons.
> On Jul 22, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Michael <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 2018-07-22, at 10:31 AM, David Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Jul 22, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Michael <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> So I found out the hard way that the version of soundflower that I'm using, >>> even if configured for 6 different 2-channel loops, only has one volume >>> control, and making any loop softer makes all the loops softer. >>> >>> I've also discovered that there's about half a dozen different forks of >>> soundflower. >>> >>> Does anyone have a version that they use that: >>> 1. Supports multiple different sound levels on different devices, >>> 2. Does not introduce errors (Static/noise) after two or three days? >>> >>> (A different version that I used to use would result in my needing to >>> restart coreaudiod to get rid of that noise, so it's not a minor concern.) > >> >> I prefer to use the rock solid commercial audio products from Rogue Amoeba, >> instead of open source solutions: >> >> https://rogueamoeba.com/freebies/soundflower/ >> > > Ohh, lovely: > > Webpage: > Initial development and maintenance of Soundflower was done by Cycling '74. > In 2014, Cycling '74 passed stewardship of Soundflower to Rogue Amoeba, but > we ultimately didn't have the time or resources to improve the product. > > Thankfully, at the end of 2015, Soundflower's original author Matt Ingalls > picked up the baton. The project can now be found via this GitHub link. If > you're looking to use Soundflower, that's the link to visit. > > So I have used that Cycling '74 version, and it gave me that noise after > days. I knew that R.A. didn't have any improvements to it, and I did find at > least one other bugfix distribution. > > Now that the original author has gotten back to it? > ... Sadly, nothing in the last 4 years except a readme update. So, no go. > > But now there's something like 300 forks of soundflower on GitHub. YEISH. > > So, I'm back to my question: Anyone got one that works well? > > _______________________________________________ > MacOSX-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk _______________________________________________ MacOSX-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk
