In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Cantrell) wrote:

> It matters not that he wrote Mac::Glue.  He's published it, so I can use it 
> too.  And I have just as much difficulty with using Mac::Glue as I do with 
> using Applescript.  That difficulty is solely because Applescript and all 
> its trappings like the events and methods and stuff* that applications 
> expose, and how to call them, is so piss-poorly documented that it may as 
> well not be documented at all.
> 
> * - so badly documented that I don't even know what the correct terminology 
> is

Yeah, the majority of problems I have in Mac::Glue are as you say.  The 
reason I sometimes test in AppleScript is not because it is easier, but 
because feedback is more immediate when I am trying to figure out why an app 
is not responding as I think it should.  It's really a giant PITA, but it is 
mostly the fault of the design of Apple events, or the design of a given 
app, and not something either tool really makes that much easier.

Speaking of documentation, something new with Mac OS X's Mac::Glue is 
gluedoc, a perldoc wrapper:

   % gluedoc Finder

Tells you all the events, classes, etc. for the Finder.  Those glue PODs 
were created for Mac OS version too, but now are more easily accessible.  
gluedoc -h for more info.

-- 
Chris Nandor                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]    http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network    [EMAIL PROTECTED]     http://osdn.com/

Reply via email to