I have sent two test files (a text file that failed to make it through to the list) to Ask Bjorn Hansen and received these replies: 1) in relation to a 'BinHex' attachement: At 2:53 am -0800 16/02/01, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: >yes, application/mac-binhex40 is filtered out. If you can ask on the >list and get consensus for not doing that I'll take it out. 2) in relation to an 'AppleDouble' (MIME'd) attachment. At 2:53 am -0800 16/02/01, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: >in the second file you sent, the data part of the attachment would >have made it through. And be easily readable for all mail readers >too. (it is just text after all). So the question to us all is: do we want the 'BinHex' filter removed? My own feeling is I _would_ like to see it removed. Unencoded scripts, documents with long lines and/or high-ascii characters always get mangled along the way. For Mac users 'BinHex' is kind of the conditioned reflex and for Eudora fans the usual (?) default setting. Alan Fry
