On Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:09:17 -0400, Chris Nandor wrote:
>At 13:00 -0600 2001.10.16, Keary Suska wrote:
>>My vote is for McPL/TEXT. I can't recall the last time I opened a module to
>>read it's documentation by double-clicking it. I find it more convenient and
>>navigable to open from the dialog. I often want/need to look at the module
>>code, however, where it is more convenient to open from the finder.
>
>Many modules cannot be viewed in MacPerl anyway, since they are too big. I
>usually end up dragging it to BBEdit (or using a contextual menu item to do
>that).
True! So looking at a module's source by doubleclicking on it, isn't
always very conventient.
Perhaps one should consider including an option in Shuck which perldoc
also has: the possibiliy to look at the module's source, using the -m
switch.
Not really.
--
Bart.
