I'm personally fond of just patch-<filename>. The .diff seems
redundant, what with the patch- already there.
On Jan 25, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jan 25, 2007, at 02:26, Randall Wood wrote:
I have seen no standard that states how patch files are to be named
I have:
http://darwinports.opendarwin.org/docs/ch04s07.html
"The standard convention is to name the patch file 'patch-
<filename>.diff, with one diff file per file altered in the source.
If the filename is ambiguous because there are multiple files with
that name in the distribution, supply the path components to
uniquely identify the file being patched."
I have been following this standard.
--
Kevin Ballard
http://kevin.sb.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tildesoft.com
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
