I'll definitely look into it, thanks for the suggestions.
On Jan 31, 2007, at 7:16 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
Hey Kevin! Seeing we could easily grow the fuse category with a
rather similar template for every port in it other than the two
base fusefs and libfuse ports, or so I think, this would seem like
great candidate for a new PortGroup code a la perl PortGroup, ruby,
aqua, etc...
Do I have enough drag to encourage you to write the base code for
the group? It shouldn't be too hard for you to take a look into the
existing groups in base/src/port1.0/resources/group/ and figuring
out the requirements and syntax ;-) Once written, the sshfs port
could be rewritten as an initial test against the group before
other ports leverage it... up for inclusion in 1.4 if time &
testing permits, woot!
But other than that, MacFUSE PortGroup or not, kudos to you for
bringing this into our repo, I'm sure many will have lots of
thanking words for you, here are mine!
--
Kevin Ballard
http://kevin.sb.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tildesoft.com
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
