On Apr 10, 2007, at 9:33 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:Back again on 1.4.1, if I don't get any feedback within, say, two days, I'll tag a release candidate based on the current state of the branch and work my way toward a release from there. Speak up if you feel there's any glaring omission in the code base.OK, at the risk of being flamed for having a one-track mind, let me try a slightly different approach to my usual rant:To ask a counter-question, what would / will the difference between 1.4.1 and ToT tagged and released as of, say, two days ago? Or even sometime this week?
The global +universal variant, for one. I think the plan is to release that with 1.5 (once some more details are figured out).
I'm not looking for a line by line diff, I am wondering what features or experimental and dangerous code would escape should the latter approach be taken.It's a legitimate question - I'm not just trying to be annoying, honest. I don't have to try to be annoying, I can do that naturally. :-)
-- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
