On Jun 30, 2007, at 4:26 AM, Bryan Blackburn wrote:

On Jun 30, 2007, at 12:28 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:


        Evening everyone!

I finally created the release_1_5 branch wherefrom we'll start cutting the 1.5.x releases, really soon now I hope! For those willing to help around in sanitizing, please reinstall off this branch and test as thoroughly as posible, reporting any findings you may come by. I'll rework the roadmap to move open tickets in the 1.4 milestone to 1.5, as well as those that were fixed in it but not released to users (committed to trunk, which as of r26608 is the same as release1_5) but not to the release_1_4 branch. Any new ticket on the base component should be submitted to the 1.5 milestone, consider 1.4 closed!

As said previously, I'm mainly interested in reports on upgrading existing 1.4.x installations to 1.5 through any mean (selfupdate, make, binary -- I know there's no dmg up yet, but you can always build your own ;-). Even though I haven't received a single one to date (and supposedly "no news is good news), I'd still love to hear whatever you, the tester, have to say about it.


I did a build from trunk a few hours ago (configure/make/make install), and the migration appears to have gone fine, from an older trunk version dated several months ago (yeah, really old). Programs still work, 'port [installed|contents|provides]' appears to list everything properly, stuff moved to /opt/local/var/macports and /opt/ local/etc/macports without incident.



Though I have tested the sed calls that update the conf files extensively, could I please ask you to double check your macports.conf and sources.conf file? Is everything alright in them? Compare them to how files off a fresh trunk installation would look:

http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/browser/trunk/base/doc/sources.conf
http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/browser/trunk/base/doc/macports.conf.in (after autoconfiscation of course, with keyword substitution in)



Only issue I've seen is the .mpsaved files in receipts are left behind, is this deliberate?


Eeerrrr.. I simply did not think about deleting them, keeping them around as a "just in case" measure just as the conf files .mpsaved backups. I could include a deleting rule in a future release or even in this one if people prefer, but personally I rather keep them for the time being. No matter how much I've tested this (thankfully with all reported failures, very few to begin with, already corrected), I'm still messing around with already installed software so I prefer to stick to the "better safe than sorry!" mindframe.



Bryan


        Thanks for your report Bryan! Regards,...


-jmpp

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to