On Jul 22, 2007, at 18:34, Landon Fuller wrote:
On Jul 22, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
I see no reason why checking for darwin i386 could be wrong. Do we
really need to take care of other Operating Systems than Mac OS X? I
mean, it's called MacPorts now and is targeted on users of Mac OS
X. Who
is using it on another system?
That's no reason to -intentionally- box yourself (or others) into a
corner. The requirement is for 'x86', not for darwin, and as such,
expressing a much broader dependency is incorrect.
That's all that I meant to say. The software does not require darwin,
so the test should not be in a "platform dawrin" section. Test for
what you mean to test for.
And also see the wine port again, LDFLAGS like "-framework" won't
work
on other platforms... As platform is set to "darwin", I think this is
okay, but contrary to your statement above.
I personally have no idea what -framework in LDFLAGS does. It's only
in the portfile because that's how it was submitted to our issue
tracker, and the port seemed to somewhat work in that state, so I
committed it. I only have access to Macs to test on so I have no
information about what this flag does on other platforms. If someone
were to report a bug that a port doesn't work on another platform,
and submitted a patch to fix the problem, I'd be happy to commit it.
Your message is the first I've heard of this issue with the wine port.
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
