Landon Fuller wrote:

On Aug 16, 2007, at 02:15, Anders F Björklund wrote:


For MacPorts 1.6, it might be a good idea to consider moving "macports1.0" from the current @TCL_PACKAGE_DIR@ directory to the @prefix_expanded@/share/macports/Tcl directory, in order to make the MacPorts installation self-contained within the designated prefix ?

If the "macports1.0" module needs to be in the system's Tcl package directory in order for other (inferior) software to find it, then can't this be accomplished by setting up a symbolic link ? e.g. /Library/Tcl/macports1.0 -> /opt/local/share/macports/Tcl/macports1.0

I'll register a "please, no!". The whole point of putting macports in /Library/Tcl/macports1.0 was to support "inferior" software that needs to be able to find the system's macports installation, regardless of ${prefix}.

What software is this?  The use case for having multiple MacPorts is fairly 
common.

We have three +1's for making the change.  Should we have a vote?

Regards,
Blair

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to