Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2007-08-22 11:06:33 -0400, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >> On Aug 22, 2007, at 10:57 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >>> But that should be easier to find where a port is located >> easier than 'port dir portname' ? > > 'port dir portname' only lists the first directory (when a port is > present in several sources).
That's good, otherwise we wouldn't be able to do something like cd $(port dir foo) And that's also the port used if you type a command with this portname. >>> (and the primary category could be changed more easily if need be). >> How often does this really happen? (and svn mv isn't really that hard >> anyway). > > There are drawbacks with some commands when one wants to look at > the history before the port was moved. > What kind of drawbacks? Even if you did a svn mv in r42 and request an earlier revision 23 via http://.../foo/[EMAIL PROTECTED] subversion fetches it from the old location. That's the advantage of svn mv over pure mv. Rainer _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
