On 2007-08-27 23:39:04 -0400, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote: > If I'm reading you correctly, you're proposing a Portfile only be accepted > as clean if it specifically states it doesn't violate the mtree? If so, > such functionality would require us going through every single one of our > Portfiles and adapting them accordingly... which is needless to say a > daunting task.
Their maintainers could do that (if the warning isn't sufficient for them). > To increase mtree violations visibility, at least for the time > being, I propose promoting them to verbose output. mtree violations aren't much visible if they aren't fatal. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
