On 2007-08-29 15:43:35 +0200, Weissmann Markus wrote: > Portfiles that conform to our standards should be the norm, so only > violators should have to indicate their non-standard behavior.
OK, so mtree violations should be fatal. > Well, I actually wanted to do this initially, leading to many angry > people who were caught off-guard with non-functional ports. As you said above, maintainers could add something to indicate their non-standard behavior (or users could report bugs). > The current state is that a violation is displayed via 'ui_msg', so > everyone will see it. Not in case of verbose output. > We can switch this behavior to a fatal one in one of our next > releases, giving people a bit of time to realize those warnings and > perhaps even fix them... It would be better to do it now, or add a switch to the port command (which could be removed later) to make mtree violations fatal. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
