Ryan Schmidt wrote: [snip] > > Half of our portfiles (2139 of 4300) are currently unmaintained. Even > ports that are maintained are not necessarily working properly. How > could we in good conscience even declare that the current port > collection is "stable"? How would dividing our efforts between stable > and unstable branches help us to improve our ports collection faster > than we do now? > [snip]
I'd gladly volunteer to take some. I think that it would make sense to assign the ports by priority: Important ones first. However, as I'm relatively new to MacPorts I don't know which ports are considered to be important (or very popular). Any suggestions? How would I go about "adopting" an unmaintained port?
Michael _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
