Is there any reason not to simply remove this port from the tree?
On 12 Oct 2007, at 02:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision 29842 Author [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date 2007-10-11
23:59:29 -0700 (Thu, 11 Oct 2007) Log Message pgp: add a note that
users probably don't want this software Modified Paths
trunk/dports/mail/pgp5/Portfile
Diff
Modified: trunk/dports/mail/pgp5/Portfile (29841 => 29842) ---
trunk/dports/mail/pgp5/Portfile 2007-10-11 23:35:49 UTC (rev 29841)
+++ trunk/dports/mail/pgp5/Portfile 2007-10-12 06:59:29 UTC (rev
29842) @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ PGP 5.0 contains support for new
encryption methods (most notably \ DSS/Diffie-Hellman), and built-
in keyserver support. Also, the \ command line has been redesigned
to be more Unix and scripting \ - friendly. + friendly. Note: this
software is old; you probably want gnupg or \ + gnupg2 instead.
patchfiles pgpFullLicense.c-patch
_______________________________________________
macports-changes mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-changes
Randall Wood
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://shyramblings.blogspot.com
"The rules are simple: The ball is round. The game lasts 90 minutes.
All the
rest is just philosophy."
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
