On Oct 18, 2007, at 14:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 30032
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/30032
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-10-18 12:20:11 -0700 (Thu, 18 Oct 2007)
Log Message:
-----------
Allow universal configure-based builds to work on Leopard
Modified Paths:
--------------
trunk/base/src/port1.0/portconfigure.tcl
Modified: trunk/base/src/port1.0/portconfigure.tcl
===================================================================
--- trunk/base/src/port1.0/portconfigure.tcl 2007-10-18 19:17:41
UTC (rev 30031)
+++ trunk/base/src/port1.0/portconfigure.tcl 2007-10-18 19:20:11
UTC (rev 30032)
@@ -68,11 +68,16 @@
default configure.macosx_deployment_target {}
# Universal options & default values.
+if {[file exists /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk]} {
+ set sysroot "/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk"
+} else {
+ set sysroot "/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk"
+}
options configure.universal_args configure.universal_cflags
configure.universal_cppflags configure.universal_cxxflags
configure.universal_ldflags configure.universal_env
default configure.universal_args --disable-dependency-tracking
-default configure.universal_cflags {"-isysroot /Developer/SDKs/
MacOSX10.4u.sdk -arch i386 -arch ppc"}
+default configure.universal_cflags {"-isysroot $sysroot -arch
i386 -arch ppc"}
default configure.universal_cppflags {}
-default configure.universal_cxxflags {"-isysroot /Developer/SDKs/
MacOSX10.4u.sdk -arch i386 -arch ppc"}
+default configure.universal_cxxflags {"-isysroot $sysroot -arch
i386 -arch ppc"}
default configure.universal_ldflags {"-arch i386 -arch ppc"}
# Select a distinct compiler (C, C preprocessor, C++)
Shouldn't we continue to use the 10.4 universal SDK, even on 10.5, to
make the most-compatible universal binaries possible? Or are you
saying that using the 10.4 universal SDK does not work on 10.5? That
would surprise me.
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
