On Nov 16, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:I feel this is a small but big improvement in readability of our commit mails, thanks again to Bill for making things happen! The one(hopefully small) drawback is that now subscribing to macports- changes will be have to be strictly enforced among us committers (it was already a requirement), as otherwise your mails will be rejected by the mailinglist server. So, please, do sign up if you're a committer and are not already on the list, http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-changesSorry to step in that late, but wouldn't it be enough to set a Reply-To-Header in the mails, so the original committer will be automatically in the recipient list when someone hits Reply All. This was the intention, wasn't it? Well, let's see how many mails get rejected from the list, otherwise this would be a reasonable solution without losing mails.
Well, my portindex commit just got rejected (since I'm subscribed with my real address, but the commit message wants to send from my macports.org address).
Would it make sense to set accept_these_nonmembers to something like: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
