On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 08:05:40PM +0100, Markus Weissmann wrote: > > "This is not really a warning" (quote from the Changeset) > > Well, actually it is. This indicates that the software that will just be > installed does not meet our 'mtree' requirements *). > Think of it more like a warning of a C compiler, like "warning: possible > loss of precision" -- might be o.k. for you, but might also be fatal. Ports > that e.g. have to install executables in /usr/sbin *) can totally hose your > system. They probably won't, but they could.
Thanks for the hint, I changed this so the user should decide if its okay with him. What do you think? http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/changeset/32138 > Perhaps we should make those fatal again and add an option to port(1) for > ignoring warnings, like `port --I-know-what-Im-doing install foo'. I think it's okay to make it fatal if destroot.violate_mtree is not true (I'm not sure if this is already the case). But if the maintainer thinks it's necessary we should respect his/her decision. > Regards, > > -Markus Thanks, Simon > *) for whatever reason > > PS: You have a duplicate "set" in the 1st sentence. Thanks, I fixed it. -- + privacy is necessary + using http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x6115F804EFB33229
pgpVIV4WwUh5M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
