Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Why is it again that we need separate dmgs for separate OS releases at > all? Why don't we just have a single universal dmg, with the PowerPC > part built with the 10.3.9 SDK and the Intel part built with the 10.4u > SDK, and everyone's happy? Isn't that the whole point of universal > binaries and those SDKs? > > Frankly, that's how I'd like ports built too, when the +universal binary > is selected. But that can be a separate topic for another day.
As +universal is not the default (a very good thing IMHO), why should we distribute the MacPorts base system as universal? I don't like these universal stuff at all, for most people it is occupying disk space for no actual use. Most people will use one MacPorts installation on one system - which is obviously one architecture. Rainer _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
