Hi, I just checked which ports are using TeTeX. Quite a few.
Nomaintainer: - advi - cfengine - gnustep-make-docs - kdegraphics3 - latex2html - latex2man - lcdf-typetools - maxima - py-pyx - revtex - t1lib - tex-cm-super - tex-fourier-gutenberg - tex-utopia - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: doxygen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: gri - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: caml-pcre - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: TeXmacs cadabra DoCon breqn lhs2tex - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: latex2rtf - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: gsl - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: sml-mode.el - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mftrace - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: rubber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: latex-mk - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tetex-rechnung - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: dvipdfmx - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: gnuplot - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tex-tipa xdvipdfmx XeTeX - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: auxtex - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: bibtex2html - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: octave - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: BibTex gtamacfonts - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: pari I think the best would be to mail all of them and ask if they can update their port to texlive. The other ports should be tested and then updated to texlive (and maybe also updated). What do you think? Simon -- + privacy is necessary + using http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x6115F804EFB33229
pgpFKG6IbCdBy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
