On Jan 16, 2008, at 06:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 32999 http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/32999 Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2008-01-16 04:55:44 -0800 (Wed, 16 Jan 2008)Log Message: ----------- update changelog for r32194 and r32724 Modified Paths: -------------- trunk/base/ChangeLog Modified: trunk/base/ChangeLog =================================================================== --- trunk/base/ChangeLog 2008-01-16 11:01:26 UTC (rev 32998) +++ trunk/base/ChangeLog 2008-01-16 12:55:44 UTC (rev 32999) @@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ Unreleased:
[snip]
+ - Enable 64 bit environment, ppc64 x86_64, for all +universal builds (mww in r32194).
May I change this so that we only build 32-bit versions again, please? I've already encountered ports that built fine as 32-bit universals that fail as 64-bit universals. Also, we still haven't thought of a solution for all the users who already have 32-bit +universal ports installed. What happens when they upgrade to a version of MacPorts that includes this change and continue building +universal ports? Everything goes to Hell, that's what happens, because the new ports want to build 4 architectures but the existing dependencies are only built with 2 architectures.
If nobody offers a clear objection to this in 72 hours I'll change it to just the two 32-bit architectures again.
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
