That's what I thought, from the guide, but went with what lint told me
at the time :(
Happy to add them back in once someone decides on a standard.
b
On Feb 5, 2008, at 12:34 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008, at 07:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 33790
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/33790
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008-02-05 05:40:09 -0800 (Tue, 05 Feb 2008)
Log Message:
-----------
linted
Modified Paths:
--------------
trunk/dports/devel/cut/Portfile
Modified: trunk/dports/devel/cut/Portfile
===================================================================
--- trunk/dports/devel/cut/Portfile 2008-02-05 13:28:15 UTC (rev
33789)
+++ trunk/dports/devel/cut/Portfile 2008-02-05 13:40:09 UTC (rev
33790)
@@ -1,12 +1,11 @@
-# -*- coding: utf-8; mode: tcl; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode:
nil; \
-# c-basic-offset: 4 -*-
vim:fenc=utf-8:filetype=tcl:et:sw=4:ts=4:sts=4
# $Id$
[snip]
Actually, we are trying to *add* modelines to portfiles, not remove
them, though I wish we would standardize on a single modeline and
not just whatever someone feels like using.
"port lint" in MacPorts 1.6.0 is broken in its check for modelines.
This was fixed in trunk already:
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/13496
!DSPAM:47a8a27a618281433542597!
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
