On 2008-02-17 09:15:47 -0500, Kevin Ballard wrote: > Right now we're providing the official, released, stable version. That's > what we should provide.
I agree that it should be provided. What I was requesting is that 2.13 be provided as well (but 2.27 would still be the default). And I don't think one can blame Debian or administrators of machines that have 2.13 only, in particular because 2.27 was released as stable on January 21: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/unison-announce/message/51 i.e. less than a month ago. If you still think that 2.13 is outdated and must not be provided for this reason, then I propose to remove any software that is more than one-month old. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
