[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Revision > 36812 <http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/36812> > Author > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date > 2008-05-15 02:29:32 -0700 (Thu, 15 May 2008) > > > Log Message > > Fix pre-caffine mistake from r36811 and put these ports in the correct > category > > > Added Paths > > * trunk/dports/devel/glade/ > * trunk/dports/devel/glademm/ > > > Diff > > > Copied: trunk/dports/devel/glade (from rev 36811, > trunk/dports/net/glade) > > > Copied: trunk/dports/devel/glademm (from rev 36811, > trunk/dports/net/glademm) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > macports-changes mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-changes
After this change there are redundant copies of glade in gnome and net and glademm in net. Also how about libglade2 and libglademm which are still in gnome? Finally, are glademm and libglademm different versions of the same port? Looks like libglademm is more current. If they are the same, do we need both? Dave _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
