Adam Mercer wrote: > Lame does not build universally using the usual configure trick, and a > solution has been found (see #15995) that essentially builds the port > numerous times and then stitches the output together using lipo. This > does not seem a very neat solution too me, I feel that this should be > part of base and not done at the per port level. Is there any plan to > add something like this to base?
Yes, this is really neat and is usually the way to create universal binaries. In Google Summer of Code 2007 was a project to implement this in base, but it did not complete. The final result which came out is proc merge in port1.0/portutil.tcl. It actually does all the stuff needed to merge multiple trees together with lipo. Missing is a way to run the port phases multiple times for all requested platforms and then call proc merge. Rainer _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
