Sorry, failed to reply to all.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Randall Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 6:15 AM
Subject: Re: MacPorts 1.7.0 without GSoC contributions
To: Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Why not call it 1.6.1 and branch 1.7.0 once the GSoC privileges code
is integrated? The Framework is (being) designed to ship as a port.

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would think we would want to release MacPorts 1.7.0 without the
> Google Summer of Code contributions, simply since I expect most users
> haven't tested that code yet and we want to release code that's well-
> tested. We probably don't need to make a 1.7 branch right now, but I
> would keep this in mind so that whenever we do create 1.7.0 we do so
> from a point before the GSoC code is merged in (and then merge into
> the 1.7 branch changes made on trunk after the GSoC merges if
> necessary).
>
> _______________________________________________
> macports-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
>



--
Randall Wood
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"The rules are simple: The ball is round. The game lasts 90 minutes.
All the rest is just philosophy."



-- 
Randall Wood
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"The rules are simple: The ball is round. The game lasts 90 minutes.
All the rest is just philosophy."
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to