Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Sep 26, 2008, at 12:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Revision: 40228 >> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/40228 >> Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Date: 2008-09-26 10:23:04 -0700 (Fri, 26 Sep 2008) >> Log Message: >> ----------- >> New upstream 2.7.2.RC2 release of Scala. >> >> Modified Paths: >> -------------- >> trunk/dports/lang/scala/Portfile >> >> Modified: trunk/dports/lang/scala/Portfile >> =================================================================== >> --- trunk/dports/lang/scala/Portfile 2008-09-26 14:40:59 UTC (rev >> 40227) >> +++ trunk/dports/lang/scala/Portfile 2008-09-26 17:23:04 UTC (rev >> 40228) >> @@ -3,8 +3,7 @@ >> PortSystem 1.0 >> >> name scala >> -version 2.7.1 >> -revision 1 >> +version 2.7.1.99.2.7.2.2 > > If one makes use of the epoch variable, then this kind of version > munging isn't necessary, is it? > > Today you would have set the version to "2.7.2.RC2". And at a later time > when 2.7.2 final is released, you would set the version to "2.7.2" and > increase the epoch. Right?
Right, but I don't plan on increasing the epoch every time though. Blair _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
