Adam,Thanks for the patch. This looks good to me. Does anybody have a use case where inheritance is not the right thing here?
James On Sep 30, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Adam Byrtek wrote:
There had been no response to my previous post (quoted below), so I decided to try again. Could one of the MacPorts maintainers take a look at the patch, please? This is actually quite a trivial change that will make the user configuration much more convenient. Best regards Adam ByrtekOn Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Adam Byrtek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I've made a tweak in handling of macports.conf configuration file, nowthe global file defines defaults and user configuration can just override parts of it. More information can be found in this thread on macports-users: http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2008-August/011273.html The actual patch is available here: http://trac.macports.org/ticket/16329 A similar problem had been raised on this list a year ago, bus as far as I know didn't result in a patch: http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2007-April/001373.htmlI'm looking forward for reviewing and applying the patch if you find it valid.Best regards, Adam Byrtek_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
