On Oct 14, 2008, at 17:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Revision: 40784 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/40784 > Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 2008-10-14 15:38:14 -0700 (Tue, 14 Oct 2008) > Log Message: > ----------- > * distract: make the port's name lowercase so it matches the > directory and makes port lint happy > > Modified Paths: > -------------- > trunk/dports/devel/distract/Portfile > > Modified: trunk/dports/devel/distract/Portfile > =================================================================== > --- trunk/dports/devel/distract/Portfile 2008-10-14 22:27:30 UTC > (rev 40783) > +++ trunk/dports/devel/distract/Portfile 2008-10-14 22:38:14 UTC > (rev 40784) > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ > > PortSystem 1.0 > > -name DisTract > +name distract > version 0.2.5 > categories devel > maintainers tommyd
Have you tested what happens if a user has "DisTract" installed and then you update the port to a new version when it's called "distract" and the user needs to upgrade? Does "port outdated" consider "DisTract" and "distract" to be the same thing -- does it properly suggest the new version? Does the upgrade work properly? Probably when the port name and directory name do not match, it's better to change the directory name rather than the port name. Perhaps the lint message should be changed to suggest that. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
