Congratulations to the new Overlords. All hail Kodos! Seriously though, while some folks on the list want to know what the terms of the proclimation are, I suggest letting the PortMgr team work through getting a new release out the door so people can quit being informed about the postflight script. In addition, they can make a dent in the pile of work that exists and take some time among themselves to determine what they'd like to propose.
I personally like the time limits let's see what the new team feels when then get the chance to catch a breath. Ryan On Oct 14, 2008, at 6:21 PM, Joshua Root wrote: > Ernest Prabhakar wrote: >> Hi James et al, >> >> Are there any explicit "terms of service" (in both senses of the >> phrase :-)? >> >> I'd like to propose that the new team commit to serve from Oct 1st, >> 2008 (retroactively) to Oct 1st, 2009, with an option for them to >> renew in one year blocks. >> >> In particular, they need to indicate their desire to continue as >> PortMgr by July 1st, 2009, so as to give plenty of notice in case >> they >> need a replacement. >> >> Is that reasonable? > > Sounds fine to me. > > - Josh > _______________________________________________ > macports-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
