On Oct 31, 2008, at 11:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 41362
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/41362
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008-10-31 09:28:16 -0700 (Fri, 31 Oct 2008)
Log Message:
-----------
science/libframe: fix checksums
Why were the checksums wrong? If the maintainer did a stealth update,
you should change the dist_subdir so that anyone who had the previous
version of the distfile doesn't now get a checksum error. For
example, do this:
dist_subdir ${name}/${version}_1
If the previous distfile and the new distfile actually differ in the
files they end up installing, then you should increase the port
revision so everyone who had the port installed before gets advised
to rebuild it. In that case, it's easiest to use the revision in the
dist_subdir:
revision 1
dist_subdir ${name}/${version}_${revision}
Modified Paths:
--------------
trunk/dports/science/libframe/Portfile
Modified: trunk/dports/science/libframe/Portfile
===================================================================
--- trunk/dports/science/libframe/Portfile 2008-10-31 16:17:29 UTC
(rev 41361)
+++ trunk/dports/science/libframe/Portfile 2008-10-31 16:28:16 UTC
(rev 41362)
@@ -19,9 +19,9 @@
homepage http://lappweb.in2p3.fr/virgo/FrameL/
master_sites http://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/daswg/download/
software/source/
-checksums md5 7fb80962ff8b99000d11b8dba0344591 \
- sha1 a0136f82ff8fc5f2fdbbd3dd1a51ab74b4243510 \
- rmd160 e8912f928a8e0f900a685188aef367cb9509e9ad
+checksums md5 309cd4988f09f0d4ac218f9183919a7c \
+ sha1 4c997129c7703e18fdbc75ee200d580aea0f8b3e \
+ rmd160 8d9a52c2baa1a3a966fb5c92620e04fa113c4070
depends_lib port:zlib
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
