On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 04:21:54PM -0700, David Evans wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what the agenda is with the new perl5 port but if the idea
> is to eventually replace port perl5.8 with it then ports that depend on
> perl5.8 shouldn't be changed to perl5 (even with a path dependency)
> until we're ready for the switch and then change the dependencies in all
> effected ports at once.
>
> Looks like doing this piecemeal won't work since you can't have perl5
> installed for some and perl5.8 installed for others.
>
Why do we have a perl5 port alongside the perl5.8 and perl5.10
ports? If its breaking things it seems to me we shouldn't have a plain
'perl5' port until we're ready to make an proper switch to it.
-eric
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
