nox wrote:
>>> By the way, shouldn't it be better to create a new variable
>>> `fetchfiles` which would
>>> replace the default mechanism offered with master_sites distname
>>> extract.suffix and all?
>>> Tricky ports like this one would just have to write the url of the
>>> file(s) to fetch in `fetchfiles`.
>> How would that work together with the distfiles mirrors?
>>
>
> The same way as it does with distfiles, the file fetched from the URL
> can be uploaded to /$name/ on the distfiles mirrors.
But we need to extract a name from that URL given to fetchfiles, so we
would stillt need the distfiles directive (or assume default
${name}-${version}${extract.suffix}).
Rainer
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
