On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 07:29:50PM +0100, nox wrote:
> Le 17 nov. 08 à 19:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>
>> ---- Makefile.orig   2008-10-22 11:12:25.000000000 +0200
>> -+++ Makefile        2008-10-22 11:13:23.000000000 +0200
>> +--- Makefile.orig   2008-11-13 19:55:15.000000000 +0100
>> ++++ Makefile        2008-11-13 19:56:36.000000000 +0100
>>  @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
>>   #
>>   # Define NO_R_TO_GCC_LINKER if your gcc does not like "-R/path/lib"
>> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
>>      # Some gcc does not accept and pass -R to the linker to specify
>>      # the runtime dynamic library path.
>>  -   CC_LD_DYNPATH = -Wl,-rpath=
>> -+   CC_LD_DYNPATH = -Wl,-rpath,
>> ++   CC_LD_DYNPATH = -L
>>   else
>>      CC_LD_DYNPATH = -R
>>   endif
>
> Instead of a patch, can't you just do `build.args-append
> CC_LD_DYNPATH=-L`?
>
> Regards,
> Anthony Ramine.

I didn't test this as the patch worked fine for me and others on the ticket.
Feel free to change it if it works.

But I like the patch idea a bit more because it makes clear what we (MacPorts)
changed to get the application to build. If git changed the Makefile we would
immediately know it because the patch fails.

Simon
-- 
+ privacy is necessary
+ using http://gnupg.org
+ public key id: 0x6115F804EFB33229

Attachment: pgpJREebxq4df.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to