On Nov 30, 2008, at 23:46, Neil wrote:


On 1 Dec 2008, at 00:39, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

On Nov 30, 2008, at 15:17, MacPorts wrote:

`sudo port upgrade outdated`

-(you can add the `-v` flag following "port" in the above command if you'd like to watch the compiler output).
+To upgrade all outdated ports and their dependencies:
+
+`sudo port upgrade -R outdated`
+
+(You can add the "`-v`" flag following "`port`" in the above commands if you'd like to watch the compiler output.)

Do we really want to advise users, in the quick-start guide, to use the -R option, which, according to multiple reports, doesn't work so great?


I didn't know. If it doesn't work well, you could take it out; or perhaps you might simply consider putting a disclaimer on it. I didn't find it anywhere else in the documentation except for man pages, and I thought it could also be useful.

Then again, how often does an update of a port induce a new dependency? (Since existing dependencies should be caught up in `sudo port upgrade outdated`...)

"port upgrade -R foo" also upgrades dependents (ports that depend on foo), not dependencies (ports that foo depends on); dependencies are always upgraded unless you use the "-n" flag.

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to